Looking back on our day at the MACUL Conference, I thought it was a really valuable experience, and I hope I can go back next year. While I enjoyed all of the presentations that I saw, there were a few that really stood out to me.
While the first presentation we saw was geared more towards math teachers, our presenter had a really interesting way of differentiating her instruction, and making her grading system extremely explicit for students. We attended Collaborating to Assess Student Learnig Using a Variety of Methods by Amy Nelson. She has created "menus" for her students. The menu consists of projects or activities that the students can complete during the unit to earn an A, B, or C. Each item has a certain point value based on the level of effort needed to complete the task. 70 points is the lowest amount needed to earn a C on the menu. What was even more interesting was the fact that the tiers of the menu also coincided with Bloom's taxonomy, so the work that a student does for an A usually consists of a more metacognitive or creative project. While the unit menu that was presented was for an Algebra class, I think the menu idea could work in an English class. I haven't had the opportunity to see if other ELA teachers are using a menu concept, but I think that the menu could involve a writing component along with other supplemental activities/reading centered around the novel that the students are currently reading.
Another really interesting seminar I attended included writing with Google Drive. Not all of the information was new to me because I use Google Drive quite a bit with my students, but I did learn about some really awesome features that the program has to offer. The name of this session was Editing, Commenting, Suggesting, Oh My! with Karen Chichester. First, the presenter showed us how she helps students with research. I know copying and pasting information into an essay is a problem with my students. Google Slides is a great way to make "notecards" for the students and the students are allowed to access information with Google automatically citing where the student found the source. It is extremely easy to access. Just got to "Tools" then "Research" and Google provides you with a search bar in the window. Students can simply click and drag information over, and Google makes a footnote that links the student back to where they found the information. What was also great about this presentation was the use of text-to-speak apps that are becoming add-ons for the Google Drive program. This particular presenter uses the text-to-speak to have her students hear their work aloud, then make revisions if the work does not sound right when it is read. I often encourage my students to read what they've read to themselves out loud, and I'm sure that the students don't always take this advice. By using the text-to-speech apps, I'm hoping they will take advantage of hearing their work out loud, and then using their ears to make revision choices. I really thought all of the suggestions that this presenter gave for using Google Drive to were great for helping students become authors. Her philosphy is that we are not just teaching students to write, but we are helping them take ownership of their writing. I totally plan on using all of her suggestions with my students to help them with their own writing projects.
It's two days later, and I think I'm still trying to process all the new things I learned about at MACUL. There was one message that was clear throughout the conference; and it was that technology is only a tool we use. At the end of the day there needs to be effective teachers in the classroom that help students, and the technology is just a tool that helps us be effective with our practice.
Holly,
ReplyDeleteYour description of the differentiating instruction brought a lot of questions to my mind. From our EDUC 510 class, one of our goals with differentiation is to bring students up to a higher level. I see that students can choose a project or activity to complete, but what will motivate them to extend their learning? What if a student is happy at a ‘C’ level and doesn’t want to do any further work? Will there be an additional incentive for him or her to attempt a more complicated task? Also, I think we all experienced the difficulty of writing and providing multiple assignments for students at different tier levels in our 510 class. Were there any suggestions in the presentation on how to offer these different assignments without overwhelming the teacher with extra work? I’m really encouraged to see that other educators are differentiation their instruction and what we’re learning in the MAC program is the future of pedagogy. Thank you for sharing your MACUL experience!
I love the menu idea! I'm wondering if I could revamp my participation point system to have more of a menu feel. As it is, students are given a certain amount of points and then can earn extra credit by participating more in class. I think the menu could give students more options, especially for my quieter students. Wilbur, I see your point. What if there was some kind of competition or a leveling up system? Or maybe tie a certain menu item to some kind of reward? That might encourage students to stretch but still keep it fun and flexible.
ReplyDeleteHolly, it sounds like the menu grading system could be a great alternative to traditional grade books. I've been reading about alternatives like this, and if you're interested there is a professor here at the University of Michigan who recently changed his grading scale to allow a lot more student choice over what assignments they will be graded on and what the weight of those would be. It seems like it's been a success so far, here is a link to an article about it!
ReplyDeletehttps://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/05/18/university-michigan-professor-explores-innovative-grading
Holly,
ReplyDeleteI too was overwhelmed by all the information and possibilities by MACUL, and I think I would like to go back next year just so that I can use my experiences from this year to guide me. Additionally, I would be curious to hear if any of the speakers I visited this year return next year with new developments/research to add to their talks.
I am extremely intrigued by the math presentation that you attended about differentiation. In particular how the presenter was able to use menus that corresponded to Bloom’s taxonomy. Is something that she uses all the time or just occasionally? I am intrigued by the thought of integrating something like this into my classroom, but I am concerned about the time it might take to prepare and set it up for students. It definitely sounds like she has a great system though and I will have to continue considering how something like this could fit into my own practice.
Hey Holly,
ReplyDeleteI agree, I definitely left the conference feeling super overwhelmed with info but in a good way. I think the conference made me realize how many advances there have been in reforming education using technology which I appreciated because it was a perspective unfamiliar to me. The math presentation discussing differentiation in the classroom sounds extremely interesting and I wish I would have been able to go! A method similar to this one was used in my Political Science 101 course here at the University of Michigan. Our professor explicitly stated at the beginning if the course that participation in class (which involved using and iclicker etc.) was a portion of the grade but the rest was decided upon us. He gave us options on how to receive a B or an A, the difference being the type of paper written and one other thing that I cannot remember. I liked having this menu option because it gave me flexibility, which honestly was something I needed at that time. At the same time, I feel having this option made the class easier in the sense that I did not learn as much. I knew what I had to complete to get the A or B+ etc. so I didn't want to pay attention to everything else. I wonder how this method would play out in a high school setting? Anyways, great post!
Just read Jeremy's post, that was my professor that I was talking about! Haha!
ReplyDeleteHolly, I think that the idea of having a menu of projects that students could choose from is a great idea. I have been struggling with coming up with ideas in terms of how I can implement projects in my classroom but still give students some choice. I think that framing projects in a menu style format where they have the opportunity to earn an A, B, or C would be great. Especially considering that projects that earn A's often correspond with creation or metacognition on Bloom's taxonomy. Unfortunately, I don't have enough access to computers to implement some of the ideas from the Google Drive presentation that you attended. Overall though it sounds like your MACUL experience was very positive and provided you with a lot of ideas that you can carry over into your classroom in the future.
ReplyDeleteHolly,
ReplyDeleteThat Google Slides/Research thing sounds pretty sweet. Totally agree with you on Drive. As much as it leaves plenty to be desired, there's no doubt that its sheer robustness (is that a word?) makes it an absolutely critical tool to know.